Bullhead Slick

Yesterday I headed to the Faribault, Minnesota, area, about an hour west of Rochester, hoping to catch something new for my list—perhaps a Common Carp, Bigmouth Buffalo, or Smallmouth Buffalo. I didn’t manage to catch any of those species, but I did catch quite a few fish over the course of the day.

I started by fishing below Smith Mill Dam. I should never complain about catching fish, but it became a little frustrating when I found myself catching bullhead after bullhead, most of them Black Bullheads. I lost track, but I probably caught around 15 of them. I also caught one Smallmouth Bass.

At one point during the morning I noticed what looked like a black oil slick floating on the water. At first I dismissed it as possible pollution. Later, however, I caught a tiny, jet-black fish no larger than a minnow.

Black Bullhead fry

You can see that it is not much bigger than the hook on which I caught it. In fact, I actually snagged it. I was puzzled by what it was, so I posted the photo to iNaturalist, which identified it as a Black Bullhead. Incidentally, the little rascal managed to poke me with its prominent dorsal spine through my rubber glove while I was unhooking it.

The catch made me think again about the mysterious black slick I had noticed earlier, which was still drifting near where I was fishing. I took a closer look and suddenly realized that the “oil slick” was actually an enormous school of minnow-sized Black Bullheads. The school was at least five feet long and about a foot wide, and I would estimate it contained several thousand fish.

Black Bullhead fry swarm

After doing a little research, I discovered that I had witnessed a phenomenon that appears only briefly each summer—a classic young-of-the-year bullhead swarm. Black Bullheads produce extremely large broods, often numbering between 2,000 and 10,000 fry. After hatching, the fry stay together in a tightly coordinated school that moves almost like a single organism. The group is so dense and dark that it resembles a drifting shadow in the water.

These swarms are typically only a few square feet in size but can contain thousands of jet-black, minnow-sized fry packed so tightly that they appear almost solid. They are usually found in warm, shallow areas with little current. The location where I observed them was a perfect fit.

Smith Mill Dam

They were gathered below the dam because bullhead fry prefer warm water, slow current, abundant plankton, and relative protection from predators. The tailwater at Smith Mill provides all of these conditions, and it is common for fry to congregate in sheltered pockets downstream of small dams.

Young bullheads form these dense schools as a predator-avoidance strategy. The swarm makes it more difficult for predators to target individual fish, allows the group to move as a coordinated unit, helps keep the fry in suitable habitat, and provides safety in numbers during one of the most vulnerable stages of their lives. Adult bullheads sometimes guard the young early on, but even after parental care ends, the fry continue schooling until they grow larger.

Bullhead fry swarms are not commonly seen because they exist for only a few weeks each year. So, while I spent much of the morning catching what seemed like an endless succession of bullheads, I was ultimately rewarded with a rare sight. In the end, discovering that living “oil slick” made the morning’s run of bullheads much more understandable—and much more satisfying.

Root River Fishing

After work today I headed down to Preston, Minnesota, about 35 miles southeast of Rochester, to try for Silver Redhorse on the South Branch of the Root River. It was a beautiful evening to fish — around 75 degrees, partly sunny, and almost no wind.

The river was extremely high compared to the last time I fished here in June. An older gentleman, probably in his 80s, told me they’d had a ten‑inch rain upstream about a week ago, which explained the high water.

I got a lot of bites but had trouble hooking fish. I was using a bottom rig with a size 8 hook and a bit of red wiggler, sometimes switching to a piece of earthworm. Both baits drew strikes, but for whatever reason most fish weren’t getting hooked.

I did manage one Brook Trout and one White Sucker, but still no Silver Redhorse. Oh well — still a very enjoyable evening on the river.

White Sucker
Brook Trout

By the way, can you see the lateral in these two fish? I can.

What the Heck is a Lateral Line: How Fish Sense Their Underwater World

What do the red arrows in the photos of the Channel Catfish and Bluegill Sunfish below point to?

Until I started fishing frequently this year, I was mostly oblivious to the presence of this line that is visible on many fish. Now I notice it all the time. The red arrows point to the lateral line.

But what exactly is a lateral line? Is it just an ornamental marking, or does it serve a purpose?

The answer is that the lateral line is one of the fish’s most important sensory organs. It allows fish to detect water movement, vibrations, pressure changes, and even the motion of nearby objects. In many ways, it functions like a combination of “distant touch” and motion detection.

In many fish, the lateral line appears as a faint line running along the side of the body from just behind the gill cover to the tail. Examples where it is usually easy to see include Walleye, Bass, Perch, Sunfish, and Trout. In these species, the scales that contain lateral-line pores form a visible row that looks like someone drew a line down the side of the fish.

In other species, however, the lateral line may be:

  1. Very faint and difficult to see.
  2. Interrupted, covering only part of the body.
  3. Buried beneath the skin and essentially invisible.
  4. Modified into a series of canals and pits on the head, particularly in bottom-dwelling fish.

So how does it work?

The lateral line consists of tiny sensory structures called neuromasts, which are located in canals beneath the skin or on the surface of the body. Each neuromast contains specialized hair cells covered by a jelly-like structure called a cupula.

When water moves around a fish, the cupula bends. This causes the hair cells to bend as well, generating nerve signals that are sent to the brain. The fish can then determine the direction, strength, and source of the disturbance.

Interestingly, these hair cells are very similar to those found in the human inner ear, which helps us detect sound and maintain balance.

The lateral line provides fish with a remarkable amount of information about their surroundings. It helps them:

  • Detect approaching predators before they are seen.
  • Locate prey hidden in darkness or murky water.
  • Avoid obstacles such as rocks, logs, and shorelines.
  • Maintain position in flowing water.
  • Coordinate movements with other fish when schooling.

A fish can often sense the pressure wave created by an approaching predator or prey item before seeing it. In a school of fish, the lateral line helps individuals stay properly spaced and synchronized with their neighbors, allowing the entire school to turn almost instantaneously.

For anglers, the lateral line helps explain several familiar observations:

  • Why vibrating spinnerbaits can be so effective.
  • Why rattling crankbaits often work well in stained or muddy water.
  • Why fish sometimes seem aware of a lure before they can actually see it.

In murky water, a fish may “feel” a lure with its lateral line long before its eyes pick it up.

So there you have it. The lateral line is not just a stripe running down the side of a fish. It’s an important sensory organ that helps fish make sense of the underwater world. I had looked at it for years without really appreciating what it did. Now I suspect I’ll notice it every time I catch a fish.


Fishing the Minnesota River

Yesterday, smoke from the wildfires in northern Minnesota and Canada drifted into southeastern Minnesota, producing some of the worst air quality Rochester has experienced this summer. The AirNow website showed an air quality index of 151 for Rochester—bright red on the map and categorized as “unhealthy.” Since the smoke appeared to be less severe farther west, I decided to spend the evening fishing around Mankato.

My target species were Silver Redhorse, Smallmouth or Bigmouth Buffalo, and Common Carp. I started at the Kiwanis Recreation Area on the Minnesota River just north of Mankato. Unfortunately, access to the river was difficult because of the steep banks. After finding a fishable spot and waiting about twenty minutes without a bite, I moved on.

My next idea was to fish below Rapidan Dam, but that turned into a wild-goose chase. The dam area has been heavily impacted by flooding and is now being decommissioned, leaving no practical fishing access.

I finally settled on Sibley Park, a beautiful park in Mankato situated near the confluence of the Blue Earth and Minnesota Rivers. Once I finally got a line in the water, I began catching several small fish that I initially assumed were Yellow Bullheads. After taking a closer look, however, I began to have doubts. The fish seemed much too sleek and handsome for a bullhead, and I wondered if they might instead be juvenile Channel Catfish. After posting a photograph to iNaturalist, my suspicion was confirmed.

Channel Catfish (juvenile)
Minnesota River, Sibley Park

The most obvious field mark that distinguishes the fish I caught from a Yellow Bullhead is the deeply forked tail. Bullheads have a square or only slightly rounded tail, whereas Channel Catfish have a distinctly forked one. The fish also had a long, streamlined body, a relatively small and narrow head, silvery-blue coloration with an olive back, and faint dark spotting along the sides, all features consistent with a juvenile Channel Catfish.

What struck me most was how different these juvenile Channel Catfish looked from the large adults I had caught previously. Large channel cats develop broad heads, heavy jaws, and thick barbels that give them an impressive, rugged appearance. In contrast, these young fish were remarkably elegant. Their streamlined bodies, forked tails, and subtle iridescence created flashes of blue, silver, and gold in the sunlight.

Although the Channel Catfish was not a new species for my list, the outing was nevertheless satisfying. Catching these juvenile fish gave me a deeper appreciation for a species I thought I already knew. Having previously caught only larger Channel Catfish, I had never really noticed how sleek, elegant, and attractive the young fish can be.

Species #31 and 32: Lake Sturgeon and Flathead Catfish

It has been quite a while since I last caught a new fish species. My previous addition to the list was a Golden Redhorse on July 29. Fortunately, that drought ended today.

To improve my chances of catching a Lake Sturgeon (a new fish for me), I hired a guide named Jarrad. Jarrad told me he has been guiding anglers on the Mississippi River and surrounding waters for 37 years. His business is called Rutting Ridge Outfitters. He helped me catch the Lake Sturgeon I was targeting, was extremely friendly, and taught me a number of things along the way.

Lake Sturgeon

Since we were scheduled to meet about 10 miles north of Winona at 6:30 a.m. (an hour drive from Rochester), I got up at 4:00 a.m. to make sure I arrived on time. I pulled in at about 6:20 and found Jarrad already there and ready to launch his boat.

I had envisioned a long boat ride to our fishing destination, but it turned out to be almost within sight of the launch. We fished near the upper end of Mississippi River Pool 5A, just below U.S. Lock and Dam No. 5. Jarrad explained that sturgeon like this area because food is constantly being carried downstream from the pool above the dam.

Although I was excited about the prospect of catching a Lake Sturgeon, I also felt a little apprehensive. The forecast called for temperatures above 90°F, and I have experienced heat exhaustion—and possibly heatstroke—a couple of times in my life.

One incident occurred many years ago when my brother, his best friend, my best friend, and I went hiking in Canyonlands National Park in Utah. We lost our way and ran out of water before finally finding our way back to our vehicles. The nearest town, Moab, was about 60 miles away. By the time we got there, I was severely overheated. When I reached the hotel, I had dry heaves, but fortunately I recovered without lasting effects.

As it turned out, today was every bit as hot as predicted. There was virtually no wind and not a cloud in the sky. We managed by wearing hats, drinking plenty of water and Gatorade, and periodically soaking our shirts in the river and putting them back on. Even so, we decided to call it a day at about 11:30 a.m.

Our first Lake Sturgeon took only about 15 minutes to catch after we positioned ourselves near the dam. As the morning progressed, we landed three more Lake Sturgeon, two Flathead Catfish, and three Channel Catfish. Two of the sturgeon were estimated by Jarrad to weigh a little over 30 pounds. Both the Lake Sturgeon and Flathead Catfish were new species for me.

The Flathead Catfish and Channel Catfish were impressive fish as well, probably weighing between 10 and 20 pounds. In fact, with the exception of the first sturgeon, all of the fish we caught were likely larger than any fish I had ever caught previously. Before today, I don’t think I had ever landed a fish weighing more than about five pounds.

Flathead Catfish
Channel Catfish

Incidentally, Jarrad had recently suffered a painful accident. About a week before our trip, while we were making arrangements, he sent me a photograph showing stitches in two fingers on his right hand. He had accidentally cut off the tips of those fingers with a table saw. When I asked what had happened, he replied, “Table saw. The saw won.”

He is still learning how to adapt to tying knots and baiting hooks with his injured hand but appears to be doing very well with that. I ended up helping put quite a few nightcrawlers on the hooks throughout the day to be helpful.

I learned a lot from Jarrad. The fishing rig itself was entirely new to me. We used very heavy braided line—he didn’t specify the pound test, but I would guess it was somewhere between 50 and 100 pounds—along with an 8-ounce pyramid sinker and a massive 8/0 circle hook threaded with two or three nightcrawlers.

As I mentioned in an earlier post, fish essentially hook themselves on circle hooks. Unlike traditional hooks, there is no dramatic hook set. The fish takes the bait, turns away, and the hook catches in the corner of its mouth.

Another first for me was using a baitcasting reel. Most of the casting was done by Jarrad because he knew exactly where he wanted the bait positioned. I suspect he may also have been a little concerned that I would create a spectacular backlash, since I had never used a baitcasting reel before.

However, he did teach me the basics, and I probably made five casts on my own. He explained that you keep your thumb on the spool during the cast and then lightly feather the line as it leaves the reel to prevent tangles. He also showed me how to properly hold large fish for photographs: one hand on the tail and the other supporting the fish near the pectoral fins.

Overall, it was a very satisfying day. I added two new species to my list, caught several of the largest fish of my life, and learned a number of new things about fishing.

Gone Fishing: Management Buzzwords I’m Leaving Behind

I am retiring in October and, if all goes according to plan, will be spending a lot more time fishing and a lot less time in meetings.

That means I may soon be free from hearing some of the management expressions that seem to populate conference rooms, Zoom calls, and PowerPoint slides everywhere. Admittedly, I have used my fair share of them. Many of these phrases are harmless, but most can be translated into plain English.

Management SpeakPlain English
Circle backTalk about it later
BandwidthTime or capacity
Low-hanging fruitEasy opportunity
Value propositionWhy is this useful?
Stakeholder alignmentGet everyone to agree
Socialize the ideaGet reactions before deciding
In a vacuumIgnoring other factors
Move the needleMake a meaningful difference
LeverageUse
SynergyBenefit from working together
Actionable insightsUseful conclusions
Strategic initiativeImportant project
Best practiceProven method
Lean inBecome more involved
Drill downLook more closely
Take this offlineDiscuss separately
Parking lot that issueSave it for later
North starMain goal
Touch baseBriefly talk
OptimizeImprove
RobustGood/strong/reliable
Deep diveDetailed review
Align onAgree on
OperationalizePut into practice
Right-sizeReduce or adjust
At the end of the dayUltimately
Boil the oceanAttempt too much
Run it up the flagpoleSee what people think
Tiger teamSmall focused group
EcosystemCollection of related groups or systems
GranularDetailed
Thought partnerPerson to bounce idea

As for me, my main goal is simple: spend more time on the water, catch a few fish, and never again hear anyone talk about stakeholder alignment, synergies, or North Stars.

What the Heck are Barbels?

Having recently caught a ton of Bullheads and, just yesterday, a Lake Sturgeon, Channel Catfish, and Flathead Catfish, I became curious about the role these structures play in the lives of these fish.

Barbels (pronounced bar-buhls, not bar-bells) are the whisker-like appendages seen on catfish, bullheads, and several other kinds of fish. These structures help fish locate food in bottom sediments, murky water, deep water, and nighttime conditions where vision is limited.

Among North American freshwater fishes, barbels are found in many catfishes (Order Siluriformes), including Channel, Flathead, Blue, and White Catfish; Black, Brown, and Yellow Bullheads; and the numerous Madtom species. Barbels are also present in all true Sturgeons (Family Acipenseridae), including Lake, Pallid, Shovelnose, Atlantic, Shortnose, White, and Green Sturgeon. Other freshwater fishes with barbels include Burbot (also known as Eelpout) and Carp species such as Common Carp and Grass Carp.

Catfish typically possess four pairs of barbels (eight total), although the number and arrangement vary among species. Sturgeon, by contrast, always have four barbels positioned beneath the snout just in front of the mouth. Common Carp have two pairs of barbels (four total) at the corners of the mouth, while Burbot have only a single barbel located beneath the chin.

Although barbels have evolved independently in many different fish groups, they generally serve the same purpose: acting as highly sensitive sensory organs that help fish locate food and explore their surroundings when vision alone is not enough. From an evolutionary perspective, barbels provide a nice example of convergent evolution—different fish lineages independently evolved similar sensory “whiskers” because they offer a significant advantage in dark, muddy, or bottom-dwelling environments.

As a pathologist, I was curious about what a histologic section of a barbel would look like—that is, how it would appear under the microscope after staining. It turns out that a fish barbel is much more than a simple flap of skin; it is a highly specialized sensory organ.

In cross-section, a catfish or carp barbel typically contains:

  1. Stratified squamous epithelium covering the outer surface, much like the epidermis of human skin.
  2. Numerous taste buds scattered throughout the epithelium. In catfish, these are extraordinarily abundant. The taste buds contain specialized sensory receptor cells that allow the fish to literally “taste” objects before taking them into the mouth.
  3. Mucous cells, which secrete a protective mucus layer and help facilitate chemical sensing.
  4. A rich nerve plexus immediately beneath the epithelium. Large sensory nerve bundles course through the barbel, with individual nerve fibers extending to taste buds and tactile receptors.
  5. A connective tissue core that provides structural support.
  6. Numerous blood vessels that nourish the tissue.
  7. Supporting cartilage in some species.

Viewed histologically, a barbel resembles an exquisitely engineered sensory probe packed with receptors for touch and taste. What appears externally to be a simple whisker is actually one of the most sophisticated sensory structures found in fishes.

Now, when I look at a bullhead, catfish, sturgeon, or carp, I no longer see funny little whiskers—I see a set of highly specialized sensory instruments that help these fish thrive in environments where sight alone is not enough.

Fishing Near Home

In case you haven’t read any of my other posts, I live in Rochester, Minnesota. I’m a soon‑to‑be fully retired molecular pathologist. Over the years I developed genetic tests for diagnosing and guiding treatment for cancer—one example is a urine‑based test for detecting bladder cancer. With my team, I implemented these assays and signed them out to help oncologists and other physicians care for their patients. It’s been a rewarding career, but now it’s time to pursue my many hobbies, one of which is fishing.

I eventually hope to fish in places like Florida, Texas, and California to reach my 100‑species goal, but most days I’m content fishing close to home. Yesterday I woke up at 5 a.m. to get out before the heat—and because the early bird gets the fish.

I started in the tailwaters below the Silver Lake dam and caught a White Sucker, a Bluegill, and three Bullheads (likely black; next time I’ll check the barbel color more carefully to be sure). After that I headed to Foster Arend Lake to fish from the pier. Even at 8 a.m. it was crowded and already hot with no shade. I caught a good‑sized Bluegill, then decided to look for somewhere quieter.

That led me to explore a few places I’d never fished before. I drove north to Oronoco, a town of about 2,000 people roughly ten miles north of Rochester. The Middle Fork of the Zumbro River runs through town. In the 1930s a dam was built to create Lake Shady, a recreational impoundment upstream of downtown. The dam was heavily damaged by a flood in September 2010, and instead of rebuilding it, the city chose a river restoration approach—replacing the dam with a series of rock‑arch rapids. The project was completed in the mid‑2010s and even received engineering awards in 2019.

Middle Fork Zumbro River

Once I arrived, I found the area promising—potentially a good spot for redhorse. I used my usual rig: 6 lb line, a 1/4‑ounce egg sinker, bead, barrel swivel, about 15 inches of monofilament leader, and a size 8 hook. After about five casts I felt what seemed like a snag, but it turned out to be a nice sized Golden Redhorse. I would have stayed longer, but the heat was building and the morning was getting late, so I headed home.

Golden Redhorse

On the walk back to my car I noticed a beautiful Cardinal Flower—probably my favorite wildflower—growing along the path. A perfect ending to an enjoyable morning of fishing.

Cardinal Flower (in front) and Wild Bergamot (in back)

Making Sense of the Bewildering Array of Fish Hooks

As I’ve mentioned before, although I’ve fished on and off throughout my life, I wouldn’t consider myself an experienced angler. Over the past several months, I’ve been learning a great deal about the mechanics of fishing. One thing that quickly became apparent is the bewildering variety of hooks available. A visit to any sporting goods store reveals hooks of different sizes, shapes, and designs, with and without barbs. To better understand what works best in different situations, I decided to do a little homework. The figure below shows the basic anatomy of a fishing hook.

For freshwater fishing, there are roughly half a dozen major hook styles worth knowing. Manufacturers offer countless variations, but most are modifications of these basic designs.

Octopus hooks have a short shank, wide gap, and slightly turned eye. They are extremely versatile and work well with worms, leeches, and minnows for species such as bluegill, crappie, perch, trout, bass, and walleye. Some anglers argue that if you owned only one hook style, an octopus hook would be the best choice.

Baitholder hooks have a longer shank with small barbs along it that help keep worms and other natural baits from sliding off. They are especially useful for nightcrawlers and red worms. The tradeoff is that bait can be harder to remove and the hook is less versatile than an octopus hook. They are commonly used for panfish, perch, and trout.

Aberdeen hooks have a long shank and fine wire. They are ideal for fishing live minnows, particularly for crappies. Their thin wire causes minimal damage to bait, and the long shank makes hook removal easier. They can also sometimes be bent free from snags. The downside is that they can straighten under the strain of larger fish. They are effective for crappie, bluegill, and perch and are widely regarded as a classic Midwestern crappie hook.

Circle hooks have points that curve sharply inward toward the shank. They are most commonly used with live bait and passive presentations. Instead of a hard hookset, the fish effectively hooks itself as the line tightens. Their major advantage is a lower rate of deep-hooked fish, making catch-and-release easier. They are particularly popular for catfish and carp.

Worm hooks feature an offset bend near the eye and are designed primarily for rigging soft plastic worms and other artificial baits. They are a staple of bass fishing.

Treble hooks consist of three hooks joined together. They are commonly found on crankbaits, spoons, and spinners and are used for bass, walleye, trout, and pike. They are generally not used with natural bait.

Finally, fly-tying hooks are small, lightweight hooks specifically designed for tying artificial flies.

For the type of fishing I currently do, I have found that barbless octopus hooks in sizes 4, 6, and 8 handle most of the species I am targeting and simplify both hook removal and catch-and-release fishing.


Why I Don’t Own a Boat

My wife tells me not to tell this story.

It’s embarrassing, but I’ve always had a sense of humor about my mistakes, so I’m going to tell it anyway. It also helps explain why, in my quest to catch 100 different fish species, I do most—if not all—of my fishing from shore.

This happened a long time ago, in 2001. I was about 42 years old, and my son was 11. Within the previous year, I had purchased a new Ford F-150 pickup and a new boat, an 18-foot Rinker ski boat. I asked my son if he wanted to spend a weekend fishing in the Brainerd Lakes area of Minnesota.

He said yes, so we packed up and headed north. I think we stayed in a hotel on Friday night and planned to return home Saturday evening. I can’t remember the exact lake. There are so many beautiful lakes in that area, and after 25 years they all tend to blend together.

We launched the boat and spent most of the day fishing. Unfortunately, the fish were not cooperating. By mid-afternoon we had not had a single bite and decided to call it a day.

That decision turned out to be the easy part. The boat ramp was extremely steep. As I started pulling the boat out of the water, I heard a scraping sound. From the boat, my son immediately started yelling: “Dad! Stop! Stop! Stop!” I instantly realized my mistake. I had forgotten to trim the outboard motor up before pulling the boat out. I put the truck in park, got out, and went back to the boat to raise the motor. Unfortunately, instead of trimming the motor up, I somehow trimmed it down. That was all it took. The truck’s parking mechanism disengaged, and in an instant the truck began rolling backward down the steep boat ramp toward the lake. I jumped off the boat and made a desperate attempt to get back into the cab and put the truck in park. I didn’t make it. Instead, I fell hard onto the concrete ramp. Fortunately, I missed going under the wheels. Had things been only slightly different, this story might not be getting written. I injured my arm badly in the fall while the truck continued its journey into the lake. The truck ended up window‑deep in the water. Once water gets into the circuitry, the insurance company considers the vehicle totaled, and that’s exactly what happened. The boat sustained damage as well, although it was eventually repaired.

If there is anything funny about the story, it was what we found when we finally opened the driver’s door. About seven sunfish had somehow made their way into the cab of the truck. Those were the only fish we caught all day.

Because of my arm injury, an EMT was called. One of the EMTs was extraordinarily kind and put us up for the night since finding a hotel on short notice would have been difficult.

The whole experience was stressful at the time, but it has become one of those stories that gets funnier with each passing year.

What may surprise you is that I kept the boat for another five years. During that time, I had many enjoyable fishing and water-skiing adventures with both my son and daughter. Eventually, however, we sold it. That reminds me of the old saying that the two best days of a boat owner’s life are the day he buys the boat and the day he sells it.

Now that I’m 67 years old and even less confident in my boating abilities than I was at 42, I’ve decided that shore fishing suits me just fine. I don’t miss launching boats, loading boats, maintaining boats, insuring boats, or writing checks for new boats. I’ve also discovered that rivers often hold a greater variety of fish species than lakes, which is ideal for someone trying to reach 100 species.

That’s not to say I’ll never fish from a boat again. If a particular species requires one, I’ll gladly hire a guide or rent a boat.